Key Takeaways:
- A successful syndication follows a repeatable funnel, moving from deal fit to underwriting to investor validation before any commitment is made.
- Founder investment theory governs deal selection, and deviating from stated risk profiles undermines investor trust and capital raising.
- Syndications require two parallel workstreams once a deal is under contract: closing the real estate transaction and raising investor capital.
- Legal structure and compliance must be built quickly and early, including entity formation, exemption selection, PPMs, and operating agreements.
- Capital raising is a structured sales process, requiring investor communication, accreditation, commitment (“latching”), and disciplined follow-up.
Transcript
Deconstructing a Syndication From Deal Selection to Closing
Let’s do a deal deconstructed all the way from choosing the deal to getting it closed and funded. This is a video I recorded about two years ago, with a very small group of new syndicators. It’s the kind of work that I do a lot of times with my clients today. We don’t offer the coaching program anymore, but I hope you find it useful.
Basically, what we’re going to be doing is we’re going to deconstruct a deal. We’re going to go from the beginning of the deal all the way to the close of escrow.
Defining the Founder Investment Theory and Deal Fit
So how do we do this? We’ve got a syndication that’s for – you’ve decided to start looking for properties, you’ve got your fit. And your fit is, basically what you’re looking for is medium to low risk properties.
You’re looking at mixed use or retail components in B, C, or possibly D areas, with a moderate to low risk profile and a total cost between $3 million and $5 million. This is the scenario we’re working with.
So let’s start with the fit:
- Moderate to low risk
- $3–$5 million total cost
- B to C (possibly D) areas
- Mixed use or flex with retail
- Value-add strategy
- Five-year hold
Funnel Stage One: Identifying Candidate Properties
So to do this, you do a survey of the area and you identify three properties.
We have:
- Wilson – flex building, $3.3M, 8.5 cap, eight tenants, billboard, cell tower
- Xavier – triple net development, $4.5M raise, B location, three-year hold, high risk
- Zapier – multi-tenant retail, $5.2M, 8 cap, C-minus location, ten-year hold
These are properties that made it into your initial funnel based on surface-level screening.
Evaluating Risk, Strategy, and Hold Period
Just to remind us, we’re talking about complexity versus time. Higher complexity generally means higher risk.
- Value-add: moderate complexity, shorter time horizon
- Development: very high complexity and risk
- Cash flow properties: lower complexity but longer hold periods
Zapier, despite being a cash-flow asset, carries significant risk due to location and tenant dynamics.
Selecting the Right Deal for the Strategy
After discussion, Wilson emerges as the best fit—not because it’s the highest return, but because it aligns with the stated risk profile.
The key lesson: a great deal that doesn’t match your founder investment theory is the wrong deal.
If you’ve cultivated investors expecting moderate risk, introducing a high-risk development undermines credibility and conversion.
Transitioning From Selection to Underwriting
So now you’ve identified the property. Next, you move through:
- Founder investment theory fit
- Basic underwriting
- Investor surveying
Only after all three do you move forward.
High-Level Underwriting and Capital Structure
Now we move into underwriting.
- Purchase price: $3.3M
- Reserve account: $50,000
- Startup costs: entity filings, accounting, admin
- Financing costs: loan points and fees
- Acquisition fee: brokerage fee
Equity is raised at $1,000 per share, with:
- 1,303 investor shares
- 20% equity retained by the syndicator
- Total shares: 1,564
Projected IRR: 18.7%, high but still defensible for moderate risk.
Commitment: Locking Up the Deal
Once the deal is selected, the next step is commitment.
Typically, this means:
- 3% earnest money deposit (~$90,000)
- Escrow or option agreement
If the syndicator doesn’t have the cash:
- Bring in an investor to front the deposit
- Borrow short-term capital
Either approach must be structured carefully and transparently.
Two Parallel Paths: Syndication and Transaction
From here, two paths run simultaneously:
Transaction Path
- Financing
- Due diligence
- Loan commitments
Syndication Path
- Entity formation (usually LLC)
- SEC exemption selection
- PPM drafting
- Operating agreement
- Subscription agreement
- Marketing materials
Time is critical—this is a sprint.
Choosing the SEC Exemption and Preparing the PPM
For this scenario, Reg D Rule 506(c) is chosen because advertising is required.
Even though a PPM is technically optional under 506(c), not using one is a serious mistake.
The PPM:
- Discloses risks
- Explains compensation
- Protects the sponsor
- Serves as both legal defense and marketing document
The operating agreement governs the entity, while the subscription agreement binds investors to it.
Marketing, Investor Target Lock, and Capital Raising
With documents in place, capital raising begins.
Investors come from:
- Existing relationships
- New contacts via advertising
The goal is to reach investor target lock—verbal commitment to invest.
The process:
- Communicate opportunity
- Capture permission to discuss
- Convert interest to commitment
Accreditation, Funding, and Confirmation
Under 506(c), investors must be verified as accredited by a third party.
Steps:
- Accreditation
- Wire funds
- Confirm receipt and position
Clear communication at this stage is critical to investor confidence.
Funding Escrow and Closing the Transaction
As capital accumulates:
- Funds are transferred into escrow
- Transaction closes
- Investors are notified
This completes the process: from deal identification to funded close.
Final Reflection and What Comes Next
This walkthrough is designed to show the entire forest before diving into the trees.
Next steps include:
- Deep underwriting analysis
- Cash flow modeling
- Asset management after closing
- Exit planning and distributions
The goal is clarity, repeatability, and confidence—for both sponsors and investors.